如果它不一定与使徒职分有关，与神启性无关，那真正的原因是什么？

If it's not necessarily apostleship, and it's not inspiration, what are the real reasons?

因此，在1.0版本的先启、精化和产品化阶段，这种编码人员得不到充分的利用。

Therefore, during the Inception, Elaboration, and Transition phases of Version 1.0, that coder will not be fully utilized.

在先启阶段您将不会有很多关于以后度量的数据，但是在适当的地方您需要有一定的装置在您离开这个阶段之前搜集这些数据。

You will not have a lot of data on the following measures in the Inception phase, but you need to have mechanisms in place to gather the data before you leave the phase.

So "scripture" can refer to any kind of writing that a bunch of people consider holy or inspired or authoritative.

所以圣典可以是任何著作,只要它对一群人是神圣，神启的和权威的。

So inspiration,contrary to modern assumptions was not the criteria you hear ancient people talk about.

所以与现代观点相反,神启性不是古代人的考虑标准。

But that formulation seems in many ways to be question begging. How much precision does the subject allow? How do we know?

所允许之外的精准,但这样的逻辑本身即,在很多方面启人疑窦？